<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Maryland Weather</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81" title="Maryland Weather" />
    <updated>2010-02-09T00:07:11Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Sun reporter Frank Roylance blogs on meteorology</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.36</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Storm Warnings posted: Another 10 to 20 inches due</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/storm_warnings_posted_another.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231578" title="Storm Warnings posted: Another 10 to 20 inches due" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231578</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-08T20:40:35Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-09T00:07:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[The National Weather Service has posted Winter Storm Warnings for all of Maryland west of the Chesapeake Bay, calling for 10 to 20 inches of new snow by Wednesday evening.Read it and weep:&quot;THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN STERLING VIRGINIA HAS...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Watches and warnings" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The National Weather Service has posted Winter Storm Warnings for all of Maryland west of the Chesapeake Bay, calling for 10 to 20 inches of new snow by Wednesday evening.</p><p>Read it and weep:</p><p>&quot;THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN STERLING VIRGINIA HAS ISSUED A<img title="Windsock in Blizzard" height="283" alt="Windsock in Blizzard" hspace="5" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/Windsock%20and%20snow.jpg" width="350" align="right" vspace="5" border="1" /><br />WINTER STORM WARNING FOR...WHICH IS IN EFFECT FROM NOON TUESDAY<br />TO 7 PM EST WEDNESDAY. THE WINTER STORM WATCH IS NO LONGER IN<br />EFFECT.<br /><br />* PRECIPITATION TYPE...SNOW.<br /><br />* ACCUMULATIONS...10 TO 20 INCHES.<br /><br />* TIMING...MID-AFTERNOON TUESDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY.<br /><br />* TEMPERATURES...TEMPERATURES NEAR FREEZING AT THE ONSET TUESDAY<br />&nbsp; AFTERNOON. TEMPERATURES WILL DROP INTO THE UPPER 20S TUESDAY<br />&nbsp; NIGHT AND WEDNESDAY.<br /><br />* WINDS...LIGHT SOUTHEASTERLY WINDS TUESDAY BECOMING<br />&nbsp; NORTHWESTERLY 15 TO 25 MPH WEDNESDAY.<br /><br />PRECAUTIONARY/PREPAREDNESS ACTIONS...<br /><br />&quot;A WINTER STORM WARNING MEANS SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF SNOW ARE<br />EXPECTED OR OCCURRING. THE COMBINATION OF SNOW AND STRONG WINDS<br />WILL MAKE TRAVEL VERY HAZARDOUS.&quot;</p><p><em>(PHOTO by Jim Dawson, Trappe, Md./ Used with permission)</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lend a hand to the snowbound</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/lend_a_hand_to_the_snowbound.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231565" title="Lend a hand to the snowbound" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231565</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-08T19:28:53Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-08T19:53:01Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;As we all sweat and struggle to break free of all this snow and ice and resume our normal routines, let's try to remember those who can't get through this alone. I just received this reminder from a reader. She...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Notes to readers" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img title="Clearing snow in Cockeysville" height="337" alt="Clearing snow in Cockeysville" hspace="5" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/PX00042_9.jpg" width="550" align="top" vspace="5" border="1" />&nbsp;</p><p>As we all sweat and struggle to break free of all this snow and ice and resume our normal routines, let's try to remember those who can't get through this alone. </p><p>I just received this reminder from a reader. She asked me not to use her name or to mention the jurisdiction where she works&nbsp;because it's not an official statement. Just a heartfelt one:</p><p>&quot;<em>Please mention somewhere for folks to look out for any neighbors, friends or relatives that are</em> <em>elderly or disabled or both.&nbsp;We at the Emergency Operations Center are taking hundreds and hundreds of phone calls from elderly and/or disabled people who are looking for someone to just shovel off their front steps or clean off their cars so that they can get out.</em></p><p><em>&quot;We have very limited resources - right now it's up to volunteers with four-wheel drive vehicles to get some dialysis patients to the doctors. Or for medical emergencies.</em></p><p><em>&quot;We have no volunteers to speak of to clean off cars and shovel walks. If everyone who is able-bodied helped one person who isn't , most folks would be OK.&quot;</em></p><p><em>(SUN PHOTO/Barbara Haddock Taylor)</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>NWS: &quot;A good likelihood&quot; of more than 10 inches</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/nws_a_good_likelihood_of_more.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231540" title="NWS: &quot;A good likelihood&quot; of more than 10 inches" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231540</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-08T17:57:46Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-08T18:08:38Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[The updated Winter Storm Watch issued at noon today by the National Weather Service has effectively doubled&nbsp;the official estimates for snowfall in Baltimore with the approaching storm.The new Watch says there is a &quot;potential&quot; for 8 or more inches of...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Forecasts" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img title="Snow aftermath" height="209" alt="Snow aftermath" hspace="5" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/PX00186_9.jpg" width="300" align="left" vspace="5" border="1" />The updated <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/showsigwx.php?warnzone=MDZ014&amp;warncounty=MDC003&amp;firewxzone=MDZ014&amp;local_place1=Severn+MD&amp;product1=Winter+Storm+Watch" target="_blank">Winter Storm Watch </a>issued at noon today by the National Weather Service has effectively doubled&nbsp;the official estimates for snowfall in Baltimore with the approaching storm.</p><p>The new Watch says there is a &quot;potential&quot; for 8 or more inches of snow, and &quot;a good likelihood of snow in excess of 10 inches.&quot; Previously, the Watch called for 5 inches or more.</p><p>The Watch is in effect from mid- to late-afternoon Tuesday until Wednesday evening.</p><p>The update brings the weather service more closely in line with other forecasters in the area, who have been talking about a 10 or 12-inch storm, or as much as 20 inches, for a couple of days.&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>How would 5 to 10 inches sound to you now?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/how_would_5_to_10_inches_sound.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231505" title="How would 5 to 10 inches sound to you now?" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231505</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-08T15:23:10Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-08T17:20:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[I'm not saying that's how much we'll get when the Tuesday/Wednesday storm finally checks in, although 5-to-10&nbsp;does seem to be a conservative&nbsp;assessment of the current thinking among the meteorologists I've checked.UPDATE, Noon: The NWS has just updated their Winter Storm...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Forecasts" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm not saying that's how much we'll get when the Tuesday/Wednesday storm finally checks in, although 5-to-10&nbsp;does seem to be a conservative&nbsp;assessment of the current thinking among the meteorologists I've checked.</p><p><strong>UPDATE, Noon: The NWS has just updated their Winter Storm Watch. You won't like it: </strong></p><p><strong>&quot;ACCUMULATIONS...POTENTIAL FOR 8 OR MORE INCHES OF SNOW. THERE IS<br />&nbsp;A GOOD LIKELIHOOD OF SNOW IN EXCESS OF 10 INCHES.&quot;</strong></p><p>Earlier post resumes below:</p><p>But after the 21-inch storm in December, and the 24-inch (maybe) storm last weekend, 5 to 10 inches just doesn't seem to pack the panic value it might have, say, last year. Am I wrong? </p><p>Anyway, the National Weather Service is putting the storm potential at 5 inches or more. But that's misleading. It just reflects their belief that the coming storm will meet their criteria for issuing <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/showsigwx.php?warnzone=MDZ014&amp;warncounty=MDC003&amp;firewxzone=MDZ014&amp;local_place1=Severn+MD&amp;product1=Winter+Storm+Watch" target="_blank">Winter Storm Watches</a>, which begins at 5 inches. So that's the floor for this storm. The watches cover all of Maryland&nbsp;except the southernmost counties.</p><p>We are now moving within the 36-hour window for this storm, so the forecasters at Sterling have begun to put out <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?site=lwx&amp;FcstType=text&amp;zmx=1&amp;zmy=1&amp;site=LWX&amp;map.x=293&amp;map.y=87" target="_blank">accumulation forecasts</a>. So far, however, that only covers Tuesday before sundown. And even though they expect the snow to start after 2 p.m. in Baltimore, they're only predicting &quot;less than one inch&quot; for that time period. Sound familiar? That's about how the last storm began. The snow started late morning, and snowed until sunset without much accumulation.</p><p>We should get the Tuesday night and Wednesday accumulation predictions from Sterling later today.</p><p>In the meantime, other forecasters are all over this new storm. <a href="http://www.footsforecast.org/2010/01/winter-stormcast-zone-february-2010.html" target="_blank">Mr. Foot </a>and his stable of student prognosticators, who have done extremely well this season, are looking for 5 inches in <img title="AccuWeather.com" height="286" alt="AccuWeather.com" hspace="5" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/iws0_430.jpg" width="430" align="left" vspace="5" border="1" />Washington, and 10 inches in Baltimore.</p><p><a href="http://www.accuweather.com/news-story.asp?article=0" target="_blank">AccuWeather.com </a>has a very tight wedge on its map, where Central Maryland appears to be looking at 3 to 6 inches, with more (6 to 12) in the extreme northeastern corner of the state.</p><p>The key to this storm appears to be exactly where the coastal low decides to form and intensify after twin lows now crossing the continent out of the Southwest and the Northwest finally merge. The farther south that happens - say, off the Carolinas - the more time the storm will have to gather strength and moisture off the Atlantic and drop it on us. If all that happens off Delmarva, we'll get less snow as the storm drifts northeastward to pound New York and New England. We'll see.</p><p>NOAA's&nbsp;<a href="http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/discussions/qpfhsd.html" target="_blank">Hydrometeorological Prediction Center</a> in Camp Springs, Md. is saying this morning it believes the coastal low will begin to form over the Carolinas, but that the worst of the snow would fall to our north and east. Here's a bit of their discussion:</p><p><em>&quot;Expect the potential for blizzard conditions during Wednesday north and west of the intense surface low ... with a potential for one foot plus amounts from eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey to parts of southern New England.&quot;</em></p><p>Finally, here's <strong>Eric the Red</strong>, a professional meteorologist from Baltimore, who sounds worried:</p><p>&quot;<em>The bullseye is once again centered over I-95 corridor and points east. [Precipitation] totals will also be less south of DC, but the immediate DC burbs are under the gun again...&quot;&nbsp;</em></p><p>He is also forecasting strong winds - higher than during the last storm, which fueled blizzard conditions in parts of the state:</p><p><em>&quot;... [W]hat we just experienced is nothing compared to what is coming in terms of wind... Wednesday will feature extremely&nbsp;dangerous conditions if these models are right</em>... <em>If I had to paint a guess ... a 10-20&quot; snowstorm is on the menu, with perhaps a bit less west of Frederick and south of DC. But the wind will be a major major issue with this one.&quot;</em></p><p>The good news appears to be that yet another Gulf Coast low that's expected to develop later this week will stay down there, leaving us in sunny but colder-than average weather through the weekend.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Yes, it was a blizzard</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/yes_it_was_a_blizzard.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231429" title="Yes, it was a blizzard" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231429</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-07T21:54:22Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-07T22:04:23Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[It's official (but preliminary). The Super Bowl Weekend Storm in Maryland was a blizzard. Or, at least it met blizzard criteria at BWI-Marshall Airport and at the Patuxent Naval Air Station in St. Mary's County. It&nbsp;seems likely that many places...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Winter weather" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's official (but preliminary). The Super Bowl Weekend Storm in Maryland was a blizzard. Or, at least it met blizzard criteria at BWI-Marshall Airport and at the Patuxent Naval Air Station in St. Mary's County. It&nbsp;seems likely that many places in between also met the test. </p><p>&quot;Near-blizzard conditions&quot; were recorded at several other locations in the region, including Annapolis, meaning they had blizzard conditions, but not for the required three-hour minimum. </p><p>Here's the statement, issued Sunday afternoon by the National Weather Service forecast office in Sterling, Va.:</p><p><font size="2">&quot;<em>PRELIMINARY INDICATIONS OF BLIZZARD CONDITIONS IN ST. MARY`S AND<br />ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTIES IN MARYLAND ON SATURDAY 6 FEBRUARY 2010...<br /><br />&quot;THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DEFINITION OF A BLIZZARD IS A WINTER<br />STORM WHICH PRODUCES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS FOR 3 HOURS OR LONGER:<br />SUSTAINED WINDS OR FREQUENT GUSTS 35 MPH OR GREATER...AND FALLING<br />AND/OR BLOWING SNOW REDUCING VISIBILITY FREQUENTLY TO LESS THAN<br />ONE-QUARTER MILE ON A WIDESPREAD OR LOCAL BASIS.<br /><br />&quot;PRELIMINARY INDICATIONS SHOW THAT <strong>BLIZZARD CONDITIONS</strong> WERE<br />RECORDED AT TWO OBSERVATION LOCATIONS IN THE REGION ON SATURDAY<br />6 FEBRUARY 2010.&nbsp; THE FIRST OCCURRENCE WAS AT </em><em><strong>BALTIMORE/WASHINGTON<br />INTERNATIONAL THURGOOD MARSHALL AIRPORT IN ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY<br />MD...FROM APPROXIMATELY 12 MIDNIGHT TO 5:00 AM EARLY SATURDAY<br />MORNING.</strong>&nbsp; DURING THIS TIME PERIOD...WIND GUSTS WERE RECORDED TO<br />37 MPH WITH VISIBILITIES AT OR BELOW ONE-QUARTER MILE IN HEAVY SNOW.<br /><br />&quot;THE SECOND LOCATION WAS AT THE </em><em><strong>PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIR STATION IN<br />ST. MARY`S COUNTY MD...FROM APPROXIMATELY 12 NOON TO 4:00 PM<br />SATURDAY AFTERNOON.</strong>&nbsp; DURING THIS TIME PERIOD...WIND GUSTS WERE<br />RECORDED TO 41 MPH WITH VISIBILITIES REDUCED TO ONE-EIGHTH MILE IN<br />HEAVY SNOW.<br /><br />&quot;<strong>NEAR-BLIZZARD CONDITIONS...</strong>WHICH MET THE COUPLED VISIBILITY AND WIND<br />CRITERIA THAT OCCURRED OCCASIONALLY DURING THE STORM...BUT FELL<br />BELOW THE 3 OR MORE CONSECUTIVE HOUR CONSTRAINT OF THE FORMAL<br />NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DEFINITION OF A BLIZZARD...WERE OBSERVED IN<br /></em><em><strong>ANNAPOLIS MD...RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT...DULLES<br />INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT...AND ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE</strong> IN PRINCE<br />GEORGES COUNTY MD.<br /><br />&quot;AS WITH ANY MAJOR CLIMATE RECORD ACHIEVEMENT...THESE PRELIMINARY<br />RECORDS WILL BE QUALITY CONTROLLED BY NOAA`S NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA<br />CENTER OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL WEEKS.&quot;</em></font></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Winter Storm Watch posted for region. Again</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/winter_storm_watch_posted_for.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231420" title="Winter Storm Watch posted for region. Again" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231420</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-07T20:58:21Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-07T22:31:19Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The National Weather Service has posted a Winter Storm Watch for the region, predicting at least 5 more inches of snow due with a new storm due here on Tuesday. The Watch is in effect from Tuesday afternoon through Wednesday...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Watches and warnings" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The National Weather Service has posted a <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/showsigwx.php?warnzone=MDZ014&amp;warncounty=MDC003&amp;firewxzone=MDZ014&amp;local_place1=Severn+MD&amp;product1=Winter+Storm+Watch" target="_blank">Winter Storm Watch </a>for the region, predicting at least 5 more inches of snow due with a new storm due here on Tuesday. The Watch is in effect from Tuesday afternoon through Wednesday afternoon.</p><p>Read it and weep:<img width="354" height="274" title="NOAA" align="right" alt="NOAA" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/lwx.png" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" /></p><p><em>* PRECIPITATION TYPE...SNOW.<br /><br />* ACCUMULATIONS...POTENTIAL FOR 5 OR MORE INCHES OF SNOW.<br /><br />* TIMING...MID TO LATE TUESDAY AFTERNOON THROUGH WEDNESDAY<br />&nbsp; AFTERNOON.<br /><br />* TEMPERATURES...TEMPERATURES AT OR JUST ABOVE FREEZING AT THE<br />&nbsp; ONSET TUESDAY AFTERNOON. TEMPERATURES WILL DROP INTO THE MID TO<br />&nbsp; UPPER 20S TUESDAY NIGHT AND WEDNESDAY.<br /><br />* WINDS...LIGHT SOUTHEASTERLY WINDS TUESDAY BECOMING NORTH-<br />&nbsp; NORTHWESTERLY 15 TO 25 MPH WEDNESDAY.</em></p><p>I just got off the phone with Bryan Jackson, NWS meteorologist at Sterling. He says this storm will bring more warm air and mixed precipitation into Southern Maryland Tuesday, but the Baltimore area is expected to receive all snow.</p><p>Thankfully, this is not another soggy coastal storm coming north from the Carolinas packing loads of moisture and getting more intense as it approaches.</p><p>Instead, this one is coming across the country as two low-pressure systems. It's not going to be as&nbsp;wet as the last one, Jackson said, and it will become a coastal low only after it reaches the Delmarva coast. Its biggest impact is expected to be to our north as it intensifies and moves north from here.</p><p>&quot;We're not looking, certainly, at anything as significant as what we just had,&quot; he&nbsp;said. &quot;But we are looking at the potential for a Winter-Storm-Watch-criteria snowfall,&quot; which is 5 inches or more.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Baltimore headed for seasonal snow record</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/baltimore_headed_for_seasonal.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231396" title="Baltimore headed for seasonal snow record" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231396</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-07T16:25:09Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-07T17:39:57Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Even with the asterisks hanging like icicles from the Super Bowl Weekend Storm, it looks like Baltimore will set a new record this winter for total snowfall in a single season. If so, it will be the third seasonal snow...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="By the numbers" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Even with the <a href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/no_snow_total_for_bwi.html" target="_blank">asterisks hanging like icicles </a>from the Super Bowl Weekend Storm, it looks like Baltimore will set a new record this winter for total snowfall in a single season. If so, it will be the third seasonal snow record set in just 14 years. </p><p>According to the tally from the National Weather Service, we have so far accumulated 60.4 inches of snow since the first flake stuck&nbsp;on Dec. 5, 2009:. </p><p><strong>December 2009:</strong> 23.2 inches</p><p><strong>January 2010:</strong>&nbsp; 7.5 inches</p><p><strong>February 2010:*</strong>&nbsp; 29.7 inches&nbsp; </p><p>That total has eclipsed the No. 2 season and brings us within barely 2 inches of the all-time record. We could easily break that mark when the next storm strikes on Tuesday.</p><p><strong>Here's how the<a href="http://www.erh.noaa.gov/lwx/climate/bwi/bwisnow.txt" target="_blank"> seasonal rankings </a>look now:<img width="400" height="231" title="SNowdrift, icicles" align="right" alt="SNowdrift, icicles" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/SundaySun%20004.jpg" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" /></strong></p><p><strong>1. 1995-96:</strong>&nbsp; 62.5 inches</p><p><strong>2. 2009-10:</strong>&nbsp; 60.4 inches*</p><p><strong>3. 2002-03:</strong>&nbsp; 58.1 inches</p><p><strong>4. 1963-64:</strong>&nbsp; 51.8 inches</p><p><strong>5. 1898-99:</strong>&nbsp; 51.1 inches</p><p><em>*Through Feb. 6</em></p><p>On another topic, I've been thinking about the kerfuffle over the official measurements of the snowfall at BWI-Marshall. After a contractor (I believe the NWS &quot;contractor&quot; at BWI is the FAA staff) failed to follow NWS protocol in measuring the storm total, Sterling's meteorologists had to estimate the total accumulation, and picked 24.8 inches. The number is a conservative choice between the 28.6 inches arrived at with hourly measurements, and the 24.7 inches measured after the storm had finished accumulating and became compacted.</p><p>They concluded that the Super Bowl Weekend Storm&nbsp;beat the previous record for a two-day storm, which Sterling interprets to be&nbsp;the Feb. 16-17 piece of the four-day Presidents' Day Weekend Storm in 2003. Until yesterday, the NWS Sterling forecast office Website had always rated the 2003 storm as a four-day event that totaled 28.2 inches. Now they consider that a two-day event that totaled 24.4 inches</p><p><strong>The new results:</strong></p><p><strong>No. 1 Two-day Storm:</strong> Super Bowl Weekend Storm 2010:&nbsp; 24.8 inches</p><p><strong>No. 2 Two-day Storm:</strong> Presidents' Day Weekend Storm 2003:&nbsp;24.4 inches</p><p><strong>Still King of the Mountain:</strong> Three-day Knickerbocker Storm,&nbsp;1922:&nbsp; 26.5 inches</p><p><img width="400" height="400" title="Super Bowl Storm from space" align="left" alt="Super Bowl Storm from space" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/g12_2010038_1702_BWI_vis.jpg" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" />I can understand why meteorologists fuss over how&nbsp;they should count a four-day storm like the Presidents' Day Weekend Storm in February 2003. That event truly was a combination of at least two separate storms, with some brief period in between with no precipitation.</p><p>And I suppose there is something useful to scientists about distinguishing one-day storms from the two-day and three-day variety; although I'm not sure why&nbsp;a 20-hour storm that snows past midnight should be treated as a two-day storm, while a 20-hour storm that occurs within one calendar date is classified as a one-day storm.</p><p>And I have no clue why this is an issue now, years after the Sterling folks posted their table of the <a href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/01/accuweathers_bastardi_calls_fo.html" target="_blank">Top Twenty Snowstorms in Baltimore</a>, (also below) listing the four-day, two-storm, 2003 blowout as No. 1. (The table has now disappeared from the Sterling Web site.)</p><p>But in the end,&nbsp;it seems to me that what matters to the public is how much snow has been dumped on them, no matter&nbsp;how many days it took&nbsp;for it to end. For all of us who had to wait for the snow to stop back in 2003, and then dig out, the&nbsp;storm was a single event. And the snow we had to remove was 28 inches deep (more or less).</p><p>My vote would be to keep the old Top Twenty list, and insert&nbsp;the dear departed Super Bowl Weekend Storm at No. 3, after the Presidents' Day Weekend Storm in 2003, and the Knickerbocker Storm in 1922.</p><p>What say you? </p><p><em>(PHOTOS: Top: SUN PHOTO/Roylance-Snowdrift/ Bottom: UCAR satellite image of mid-Atlantic snow, shot Sunday 2/7/10)</em></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Sterling's Top Twenty Snowstorm, as it appeared on their Web site until Saturday. (It had not been updated with the December 18-19, 2009 storm (21.1 inches), or the Feb. 5-6, 2010 storm (24.8 inches, an estimate))</strong>&nbsp;</p><p><table width="90%" bgcolor="#ccffff" border="3" cellpadding="3"><tbody><tr><td><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>28.2 inches ... Feb. 15-18, 2003</strong></td><td><strong>11</strong></td><td><strong>14.1 inches ... Dec. 11-12, 1960</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>2</strong></td><td><strong>26.5 inches&nbsp; ... Jan. 27-29, 1922</strong></td><td><strong>12</strong></td><td><strong>13.1&nbsp; inches ... Feb. 11-12, 2006</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>3</strong></td><td><strong>22.8 inches ... Feb. 11, 1983</strong></td><td><strong>13</strong></td><td><strong>13.0&nbsp; inches ... Mar. 5-7, 1962</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>4</strong></td><td><strong>22.5 inches ... Jan. 7-8, 1996</strong></td><td><strong>14</strong></td><td><strong>12.3 inches ... Jan. 22, 1987</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>5</strong></td><td><strong>22.0 inches ... Mar. 29-30, 1942</strong></td><td><strong>15</strong></td><td><strong>12.1 inches ... Jan. 30-31, 1966</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>6</strong></td><td><strong>21.4 inches ... Feb. 11-14, 1899</strong></td><td><strong>16</strong></td><td><strong>12.0 inches ... Feb. 16-18, 1900</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>7</strong></td><td><strong>20.0 inches ... Feb. 18-19, 1979</strong></td><td><strong>17</strong></td><td><strong>11.9 inches ... Mar. 13-14, 1993</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>8</strong></td><td><strong>16.0 inches ... Mar. 15-18, 1892</strong></td><td><strong>18</strong></td><td><strong>11.7 inches ... Feb. 5-8, 1899</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>9</strong></td><td><strong>15.5 inches ... Feb. 15, 1958</strong></td><td><strong>19</strong></td><td><strong>11.5 inches ... Dec. 17-18, 1932</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>10</strong></td><td><strong>14.9 inches ... Jan. 25, 2000</strong></td><td><strong>20</strong></td><td><strong>11.5 inches ... Mar. 21-22, 1964</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&quot;Accumulating snow is likely ...&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/accumulating_snow_is_likely.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231391" title="&quot;Accumulating snow is likely ...&quot;" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231391</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-07T15:26:28Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-07T17:55:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Just as Central Maryland begins to shake off the&nbsp;asterisk-laden &quot;record-breaking&quot; snowstorm that struck Friday and Saturday, we turn to face yet more &quot;accumulating snow&quot; forecasters say will&nbsp;reach us Tuesday and Wednesday. Some models suggest we could see as much as...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Forecasts" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just as Central Maryland begins to shake off the&nbsp;asterisk-laden &quot;record-breaking&quot; snowstorm that struck Friday and Saturday, we turn to face yet more &quot;accumulating snow&quot; forecasters say will&nbsp;reach us Tuesday and Wednesday. Some models suggest we could see as much as another 10 inches. More or less</p><p><img width="350" height="466" title="Snow and sun" align="left" alt="Snow and sun" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/SundaySun%20002.jpg" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" />Yes, my weary diggers, the <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&amp;issuedby=LWX&amp;product=AFD&amp;format=CI&amp;version=1&amp;glossary=0&amp;highlight=off" target="_blank">National Weather Service </a>is advising us of &quot;accumulating wintry precipitation,&quot; beginning sometime after noon on Tuesday. The chances, for now, are rated at 60 percent for Tuesday, rising to 70 percent Tuesday night and fading to 30 percent Wednesday.</p><p>The folks at Sterling, as is their policy, are not yet venturing accumulation totals. Storm tracks and rain lines remain pretty uncertain. But this morning's forecast discussion describes&nbsp;this new storm in a way that sounds&nbsp;a bit like the one that struck here Friday, except not as intense.:</p><p>&quot;<em>HIGH PRESSURE WILL MOVE OFF THE COAST MONDAY NIGHT WHILE ANOTHER<br />STORM SYSTEM MOVES THROUGH THE MIDWEST. ...THERE IS STILL SOME<br />UNCERTAINTY AS TO EXACTLY WHEN THESE SYSTEMS WOULD PHASE AND<br />CONSEQUENTLY HOW STRONG THE COASTAL LOW WILL GET BEFORE MOVING OFF<br />TO OUR NORTHEAST. </em></p><p><em>&quot;EITHER WAY...THERE IS </em><em><strong>A GOOD CHANCE FOR WINTRY<br />PRECIPITATION LATER TUESDAY INTO WEDNESDAY</strong> AS THESE SYSTEMS PHASE<br />AND LOW PRESSURE DEVELOPS OFF THE MID-ATLANTIC COAST. </em></p><p><em>&quot;ACCUMULATING SNOW IS LIKELY FROM NEAR THE CITIES OF WASHINGTON AND BALTIMORE TO<br />THE NORTH AND WEST...WITH MIXED PRECIPITATION LIKELY TO THE SOUTH<br />AND EAST. PLEASE CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE LATEST FORECASTS WITH THIS<br />SYSTEM BECAUSE A SLIGHT CHANGE IN THE TIMING OF THESE TWO SYSTEMS<br />PHASING TOGETHER WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE AMOUNT OF<br />PRECIPITATION THAT WILL OCCUR.&quot;</em></p><p>Okay, so that's the NWS. Our newest professional contributor, Eric the Red, is thinking the new storm will clock in with something like 4 to 8 inches of new snow. Says he:<img width="250" height="422" title="Free at Last!" align="right" alt="Free at Last!" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/SundaySun%20003.jpg" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" /></p><p>&quot;<em>Models are showing a very disturbing trend for Tuesday.&nbsp; They more or less replay this storm, but with a bit less precipitation.&nbsp; The latest GFS [a forecast model]&nbsp;as well as last night's Canadian and NOGAPS [more models] show an upper-air low approaching from the west, while a secondary low forms to our south and moves to the Mid-Atlantic coast.&nbsp; At this early juncture, this kinda has a 4-8&quot; look to it... with the BIG snow headed for New England.</em></p><p><em>'Some prelim models...</em></p><p><em><strong>'WRF -</strong> Has secondary low forming at the mouth of the Chesapeake and moving slowly up the coast, with liquid equivalent (QPF - which stands for Quantitative Precipitation Forecast) of 0.50-1.00&quot;... which if all snow would be a 5-10&quot;.&nbsp; The bulls eye is east of DC.</em></p><p><em><strong>'RSM -</strong> Same idea, but begins to drift the storm back down the coast at the end of its forecast cycle.&nbsp; QPF is 0.50-1.00 (5-10&quot;), with a bulls eye in northeast MD.</em></p><p><em><strong>'PSU-Eta</strong> - Same idea, but as the energy jumps from the Ohio Valley to the MD coast, the pcp misses us.&nbsp; We've seen this happen before... so it's not out of the question.&nbsp; QPF - less than 0.10... with little if any snow.</em></p><p><em><strong>'Canadian -</strong>&nbsp; Ouch.&nbsp; Winds up another stem winder off the Delmarva coast, and punds the region with another not-quite-as-bad big hitter... say 8-16&quot;.</em></p><p><em><strong>NOGAPS:</strong> a bit farther offshore, but still paints the area with a modest snowfall.</em></p><p><em><strong>'GFS -</strong> The 12z [latest] is not in yet, but last night's 00z run (7 pm w/balloon data) is disturbing... with a strong secondary low forming at the mouth of the Chesapeake and movg slowly northeast.&nbsp; The GFS' QPF is over an inch for central MD... indicating a Canadian-model-like 8-16&quot;</em></p><p><em>'Still time to sort all this out, but needless to say, another 1 footer would be a back breaker fer sure.&nbsp; I'll keep ya posted.&nbsp; Right now, as I mentioned before, if I had to pick a number... 4-8&quot;, with precipitation starting Tues afternoon and lasting into Weds morning.&quot;</em></p><strong>UPDATE, 11 a.m.,&nbsp;from Eric the Red:</strong><em>&nbsp;7 am/w balloon data: GFS clobbers us.&nbsp; It has&nbsp;1 to 2&quot; liquid... which if all snow, would be another blizzard.... 10-20&quot;.&nbsp; In all honesty, let's hope that doesn't happen.&nbsp; I like snow... but even I have my limits. E</em><em> <p><strong><a href="http://www.accuweather.com/regional-news-story.asp?region=southwestusnews" target="_blank">AccuWeather.com</a></strong> doesn't have a snow map out yet for our part of the country. But their MeteoMadness blogger, <a href="http://www.accuweather.com/mt-news-blogs.asp?partner=accuweather&amp;blog=Meteomadness&amp;pgurl=/mtweb/content/Meteomadness/archives/2010/02/here_we_go_again_another_big_daddy_potential_tuesday_into_wednesday.asp" target="_blank">Henry Margusity</a>, seems to be putting the deepest snows to our north, leaving us in a 3- to 6-inch zone.</p></em> doesn't have a snow map out yet for our part of the country. But their MeteoMadness blogger, , seems to be putting the deepest snows to our north, leaving us in a 3- to 6-inch zone.<p><a href="http://www.footsforecast.org/" target="_blank">Mr. Foot's Forecast </a>hasn't gone there yet, but they do seem to be anticipating 4 inches or more. Hope to hear from his team soon.</p><p><em>(SUN PHOTOS/Frank Roylance/Path to my door/Claire Cohn - Thanks!)</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Maryland snowstorm sights and sounds: Video coverage</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/maryland_snowstorm_sights_and.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231355" title="Maryland snowstorm sights and sounds: Video coverage" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231355</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-07T00:56:40Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-07T01:07:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>baltimoresun.com</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<embed width='500' height='715' align='middle' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' salign='l' flashvars='&amp;titleAvailable=true&amp;layoutColumns=1&amp;carouselType=horz&amp;playerAvailable=true&amp;searchAvailable=false&amp;multipleURL=http://baltimoresun.vidcms.trb.com/alfresco/service/edge/content/0cae67c4-f433-4076-963a-3a483e39eb78&amp;adZone=weather&amp;adServ=trb.baltimoresun&amp;propName=baltimoresun.com&amp;hostURL=http://www.baltimoresun.com&amp;swfPath=http://baltimoresun.vid.trb.com/player/&amp;omAccount=tribglobal&amp;omnitureServer=www.baltimoresun.com&amp;autoPlayVideo=false' allowscriptaccess='sameDomain' allowfullscreen='true' menu='true' name='PaperVideoTest' bgcolor='#ffffff' devicefont='false' wmode='opaque' scale='showall' loop='true' play='true' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer' quality='high' src='http://baltimoresun.vid.trb.com/player/PaperVideoTest.swf'/>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Do NOT run your snow-buried car&apos;s engine</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/do_not_run_your_snowburied_car.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231344" title="Do NOT run your snow-buried car's engine" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231344</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-06T23:10:21Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-06T23:18:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Sure, you're cold. And tired. Shoveling is exhausting. But don't take your break in the car with the engine running. It could put you in a cold grave. Consider this message from a WeatherBlog reader in Columbia:&quot;Frank, you may want...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Notes to readers" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sure, you're cold. And tired. <a href="http://www.wikihow.com/Dig-out-Your-Car-After-a-Snow-Storm" target="_blank">Shoveling is exhausting</a>. But don't take your break in the car with the engine running. It could put you in a cold grave. Consider this message from a WeatherBlog reader in Columbia:</p><p>&quot;<em>Frank, you may want to help people not kill themselves as I almost did. </em></p><p><em>&quot;I managed to dig a trench to my car (Columbia, so 30+ inches) and had the great idea to defrost it. My satellite radio, unlike my satellite TV, was working so I sat in it while it was running. </em></p><p><em>&quot;I started seeing that distortion effect INSIDE THE CAR and realized carbon monoxide was coming in the car.</em></p><p><em>&quot;Someone, I guarantee, will sit in their car cave while it defrosts and accidentally asphyxiate.&quot;</em></p><p>Remember, the snow piled around your car can trap carbon monoxide coming from the exhaust. It can quickly incapacitate you before you realize what's happening. Then it will&nbsp;kill you. Clear snow from the exhaust pipe and leave the engine off until the car is ready to roll.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>No snow total for BWI</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/no_snow_total_for_bwi.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231337" title="No snow total for BWI" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231337</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-06T21:55:48Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-07T01:38:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Jim Lee, the meteorologist-in-charge at the NWS forecast office in Sterling, says a problem with snow measurements at BWI during the late departed snowstorm means we will not have an official total, perhaps for several days.On top of that, he...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="By the numbers" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Jim Lee, the meteorologist-in-charge at the NWS forecast office in Sterling, says a problem with snow measurements at BWI during the late departed snowstorm means we will not have an official total, perhaps for several days.</p><p>On top of that, he says, it's not yet clear how they will measure the four-day storm in February 2003 that currently holds title as the biggest on record for Baltimore.</p><p>One thing Lee says he is confident about is that this storm did beat the 2003 storm, by at least a fraction of an inch.</p><p>Here's the deal:<img width="350" height="262" title="Super Bowl Storm" align="right" alt="Super Bowl Storm" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/SuperBowlStorm%20004.jpg" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" /></p><p>The contractor paid to make snow measurements at BWI for the weather service (the NWS has none of its own personnel there)&nbsp;evidently failed to follow NWS protocols in measuring the snow. </p><p>Those rules say the observer must allow snow to fall on an official &quot;snow board&quot; for six hours, then wipe it clear and repeat the procedure every six hours until the snow ends.</p><p>The technique is designed to split the difference between measuring all the snow at once (which means the snow will have compacted some from its own the weight), or measuring it more frequently, and perhaps exaggerating the snow depth by eliminating most compaction.</p><p>The&nbsp;contractor measured every hour on the hour and added it up. That produced a total of 28.6 inches. He also took a &quot;snow depth&quot; reading, meaning that he measured all the snow at once, after it stopped falling. Because of compaction, that came to 24.7 inches.</p><p><img width="350" height="431" title="Super Bowl Storm" align="left" alt="Super Bowl Storm" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/SuperBowlStorm%20002.jpg" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" />&quot;We don't have an observation for every six hours,&quot; Lee said.</p><p>Sterling is now consulting with headquarters, and with climatologists, to figure out how to make a reasonable estimate of what a six-hour measurement might have been.&nbsp;&quot;We'll have to come up with an official estimate somewhere between the 24.7 inch snow depth and 28.6,&quot; Lee said.</p><p>But then what should they compare it to? The No. 1 snowstorm currently on Sterling's Top Twenty list is the Feb. 15-18 storm in 2003. The total on the Sterling Web page for that storm was 28.2 inches. </p><p>Did the storm that buried my car (left)&nbsp;beat that? It's not clear.</p><p>The 28.2-inch measurement on the Sterling Web site notwithstanding, the National Climatic Data Center doesn't recognize four-day storms, Lee said. Besides, the 2003 storm was actually two storms. His office is now focusing on two days of that storm for the official record challenge. That's the total of 24.4 inches that fell on Feb. 16 and 17, 2003.</p><p>If that's upheld by the NCDC, both measurements from BWI for the Super Bowl Weekend Storm just ended would beat that mark, so whatever intermediate figure they eventually agree on would as well. And that would make&nbsp;this the biggest two-day storm on record for Baltimore.</p><p>Lee like its chances. &quot;I'm feeling pretty comfortable saying we broke a two-day snowfall record in Baltimore,&quot; he said. </p><p><strong>UPDATE: Preliminarily, the NWS is estimating the storm's two-day BWI total at 24.8 inches, beating the 2003 storm by 0.4 inch.</strong></p><p>In the meantime, Sterling's Top Twenty Snowstorms chart was taken off the Website Saturday afternoon.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.erh.noaa.gov/lwx/winter/storm-pr.htm" target="_blank">The site still lists the February 2003 storm </a>as the <strong>biggest THREE-day storm</strong> on record for the city at 26.8 inches.&nbsp;</p><p>The <strong>biggest two-day storm</strong>, if downtown measurements are included, was in January 1922 - 26.3 inches.&nbsp;</p><p>Stay tuned.</p><p><em>(SUN PHOTOS/Frank Roylance/The WeatherDeck (top)/My poor car (bottom))</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Snow winding down; bitter cold tonight</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/snow_winding_down_bitter_cold.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231328" title="Snow winding down; bitter cold tonight" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231328</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-06T20:19:07Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-06T21:53:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[The record-breaking storm that has stalled the region under&nbsp;a weighty layer of wet snow is moving out to sea. Snowfall is coming to an end from north to south across the region as the low pressure center off&nbsp;Delmarva drifts to...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Forecasts" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The record-breaking storm that has stalled the region under&nbsp;a weighty layer of wet snow is moving out to sea. Snowfall is coming to an end from north to south across the region as the low pressure center off&nbsp;Delmarva drifts to the northeast, forecasters said.</p><p><strong>UPDATE: Blizzard Warnings on the Western Shore have been canceled. The sun is shining on the WeatherDeck in Cockeysville. The Great Dig has begun.</strong></p><p><img width="350" height="333" title="NOAA" align="left" alt="NOAA" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/northeast_loop.gif" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" />As the storm departs, cold air out of the northwest will sweep in behind it, dropping overnight temperatures into the teens and single digits Saturday night. That should turn the snow and slush on the ground to hard ice and limit the effectiveness of road salt.</p><p>There won't be much relief - or melting - on Sunday or Monday as highs stall near the freezing mark and drop into the teens at night. Worse, there's a chance for more snow on Tuesday.</p><p><a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?site=lwx&amp;FcstType=text&amp;zmx=1&amp;zmy=1&amp;site=LWX&amp;map.x=294&amp;map.y=88" target="_blank">The official forecast </a>calls for a chance of rain or snow on Tuesday afternoon, followed by a 70 percent chance for snow Tuesday night. That will be followed by a 40 percent chance of more snow Wednesday.</p><p>NWS forecasters at Sterling aren't venturing any&nbsp;accumulation totals yet. There's still too much uncertainty about the storm and the precipitation types we can expect. Safe to say it won't rival the snows of the last 24 hours. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>City total tops two feet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/city_total_tops_two_feet.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231296" title="City total tops two feet" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231296</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-06T16:48:35Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-06T19:49:44Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[The CoCoRaHS Network is now reporting a 7 a.m. snow total from Baltimore's Hamilton neighborhood&nbsp; of 25.1 inches. Two-foot snow totals are becoming quite common across the region as more reports come in. Some spots are nearing the three-foot mark.And...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="By the numbers" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.cocorahs.org/ViewData/StateDailyPrecipReports.aspx?state=MD" target="_blank">CoCoRaHS Network </a>is now reporting a 7 a.m. snow total from Baltimore's Hamilton neighborhood&nbsp; of 25.1 inches. Two-foot snow totals are becoming quite common across the region as more reports come in. Some spots are nearing the three-foot mark.</p><p>And the <a href="http://radar.weather.gov/Conus/northeast_loop.php" target="_blank">snow continues to fall</a>. It's snowing hard on the WeatherDeck in Cockeysville at noon.</p><p><strong>UPDATE at 2:50 p.m.: Snow has stopped on the WeatherDeck.</strong></p><p>Here is <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&amp;issuedby=LWX&amp;product=PNS&amp;format=CI&amp;version=1&amp;glossary=0&amp;highlight=off" target="_blank">the latest&nbsp;NWS tally</a>. And here are some early morning CoCoRaHS reports from places not yet mentioned here:<img width="250" height="333" title="Super Bowl snow" align="right" alt="Super Bowl snow" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/MoreSnow%20002.jpg" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" /></p><p><strong>Friendsville, Garrett County:</strong>&nbsp; 35.5 inches</p><p><strong>New Market, Frederick Co.:</strong>&nbsp; 34 inches</p><p><strong>Long Green, Baltimore Co.:</strong>&nbsp; 20 inches</p><p><strong>Taneytown, Carroll:</strong>&nbsp; 20 inches</p><p><strong>Greensboro, Caroline:</strong>&nbsp; 19.3 inches</p><p><strong>Pasadena, Anne Arundel:</strong>&nbsp; 18 inches</p><p><strong>Easton, Talbot:</strong>&nbsp; 17 inches</p><p><strong>Funkstown, Washington Co.:</strong>&nbsp; 15 inches</p><p><strong>Colora, Cecil:</strong>&nbsp; 13.8 inches</p><p><strong>St. Michaels, Talbot:</strong>&nbsp; 12.5 inches</p><p><strong>Princess Anne, Somerset:</strong>&nbsp; 2.1 inches</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Snowstorm is now No. 3 on B&apos;more&apos;s record books</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/snowstorm_is_now_no_3_on_bmore.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231293" title="Snowstorm is now No. 3 on B'more's record books" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231293</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-06T16:15:17Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-06T16:34:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>At 10:30 a.m. Saturday, the National Weather Service is reporting 23.5 inches so far at BWI-Marshall Airport. That makes this the third-biggest snowstorm since snow records for Baltimore began in 1883.And the snow is still falling. Another 3 inches and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Roylance</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="By the numbers" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>At 10:30 a.m. Saturday, the National Weather Service is reporting <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&amp;issuedby=LWX&amp;product=PNS&amp;format=CI&amp;version=1&amp;glossary=0&amp;highlight=off" target="_blank">23.5 inches so far at BWI</a>-<img width="300" height="225" title="Fells Point" align="right" alt="Fells Point" src="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/photo.jpg" border="1" vspace="5" hspace="5" />Marshall Airport. That makes this the third-biggest snowstorm since snow records for Baltimore began in 1883.</p><p>And the snow is still falling. Another 3 inches and this Super Bowl Weekend Storm will eclipse the No. 2 snowstorm - the 26.5-inch blockbuster on Jan. 27-29, 1922.</p><p>Forecasters do not believe the storm will topple the all-time record - the 28.2-inch storm on Feb. 15-18, 2003. </p><p>We'll see.</p><p><em>(Fells Point PHOTO by Lindsay Rothstein/Used with permission)</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Share your snow stories </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2010/02/share_your_snow_stories.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=81/entry_id=231287" title="Share your snow stories " />
    <id>tag:weblogs.marylandweather.com,2010://81.231287</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-06T16:00:43Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-06T16:13:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary>How has the snowstorm affected you and your community? We want to hear from you -- stories about what you&apos;ve done and seen this weekend -- from the serious to the silly. Please share your anecdotes by commenting below, including...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>baltimoresun.com</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Winter weather" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>How has the snowstorm affected you and your community? We want to hear from you -- stories about what you've done and seen this weekend -- from the serious to the silly. Please share your anecdotes by commenting below, including your name and city. If you're on Twitter, add #mdsnow to your tweets to have them appear in our feed.    </p>

<hr><iframe frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="auto" style="width:580px; height:250px" src="http://data.baltimoresun.com/rsswidget/r3/twittermdsnow/"></iframe>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

