•
Weather news
•
Readers' photos
•
Data from the The Sun's weather station
•
2011 stargazers' calendar
•
Become a backyard astronomer in five simple steps
•
Baltimore Weather Archive
Daily airport weather data for Baltimore from 1948 to today
•
National Weather Service:
Sterling Forecast Office
•
Capital Weather Gang:
Washington Post weather blog
•
CoCoRaHS:
Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network. Local observations by volunteers
•
Weather Bug:
Webcams across the state
•
National Data Buoy Center:
Weather and ocean data from bay and ocean buoys
•
U.S. Drought Monitor:
Weekly maps of drought conditions in the U.S.
•
USGS Earthquake Hazards Program:
Real-time data on earthquakes
•
Water data:
From the USGS, Maryland
•
National Hurricane Center
•
Air Now:
Government site for air quality information
•
NWS Climate Prediction Center:
Long-term and seasonal forecasts
•
U.S. Climate at a Glance:
NOAA interactive site for past climate data, national, state and city
•
Clear Sky Clock:
Clear sky alerts for stargazers
•
NASA TV:
Watch NASA TV
•
Hubblesite:
Home page for Hubble Space Telescope
•
Heavens Above:
Everything for the backyard stargazer, tailored to your location
•
NASA Eclipse Home Page:
Centuries of eclipse predictions
•
Cruise Critic: Hurricane Zone:
Check to see how hurricanes may affect your cruise schedule
•
Warming World:
NASA explains the science of climate change with articles, videos, “data visualizations,” and space-based imagery.
•
What on Earth:
NASA blog on current research at the space agency.
Comments
Actually, I would argue with that. If a person is going to arbitrarily assign a '02' to November 2, then why not assign a '01' to the January (month) numerical notation?
Thus, Monday's date should be, in numerical fashion, be written (in base 10 AND in Arabic numerals) 01-10-2011, which is NOT palindromic.
And it is palindromic ONLY in American usage. In other English-speaking countries, the date is normally written date-month-year, thus Monday would be written as 10-1-2011, or 10-01-2011, and thus definitely NOT palindromic (1-10-2101, or 11-02-1001).
If you are going to be consistent, then maybe Tuesday's date should be written as 1-11-11? That is palindromic (somewhat, if you don't pay attention to where the dashes are located). The TRUE palindromic numeric expression within the next decade would be 11-11-11, IMO.
FR: Dr. Inan is well aware of the variants: http://bit.ly/gW4EQS ... and he has worked out all the palindrome dates in each, including the day-month-year format. We had space to refer only to the month-day-year format.
Posted by: Mike | January 9, 2011 5:55 PM
Which only goes to show, interpretations of EVERYTHING vary.
When I enlisted, the Army expressed the date in YYYYMMDD format, absent any dashes at all - which makes all sorts of things interesting when I unthinkingly use that date format as a civilian - and makes 2 Nov 2011 a palindrome: 20111102 while also (at first glance) eliminating palindromic dates after 2 Dec 2012 until 21011012 (12 Oct 2101). (I think.)
FR: It's also a good format for filing Word files in chronological order, as in 2011.01.10.weatherstory.doc
Posted by: Earl | January 10, 2011 12:28 PM