Comet Holmes now a naked-eye object

Marylanders won't see it until the skies clear - maybe Sunday. But backyard stargazers elsewhere are buzzing about Comet 17P/Holmes, which suddenly brightened by a factor of a million this week, becoming visible to the naked eye, even in urban areas.
The comet is visible high in the sky for most of the night. The star map above shows Holmes' location in the northeast, after sunset. The view will get easier later in the evening as the Earth turns and the stars on this map rise higher in the sky. Sky & Telescope posted this today on Holmes. Here's a photo gallery.
Unlike comets Hale-Bopp and Hyakutake a decade ago, Holmes doesn't yet have that classic comet look, with a bright nucleus and a sweeping tail. Those who've seen it describe it as a new "star" to the naked eye, and interloper in the constellation Perseus, at least for those familiar enough with Perseus to know what it's supposed to look like. But in even small backyard telescopes and binoculars, it has a broader, almost spherical appearance as compared with a star, which looks like a pinpoint of light. Holmes looks more like a billiard ball or a fuzz ball.
According to the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Holmes was discovered in 1892 by an amateur astronomer named Edwin Holmes. Much as with the current apparition, Holmes brightened suddenly around the time Holmes discovered it. It later faded, then brightened again before it disappeared.
Astronomers calculate that Homes orbits the sun once every seven years. But it never gets closer to the sun than 200 million miles, twice the Earth's distance from the sun. That makes it hard to see. After spotting it again in 1899 and 1906, astronomers lost track of it until 1964.
This time, it was returning to the inner solar system as a very dim 17th magnitude object, 25,000 times too faint to see with the naked eye. On Wednesday, it suddenly perked up to a magnitude 7. And now observers are calling it a Mag. 2 or 3. Smaller positive numbers mean brighter objects, and on this logarithmic scale, that's a million-fold increase in brightness.
In practical terms it means it's about as bright as the stars of the Big Dipper, plenty bright enough to see with the naked eye, even under suburban skies if you know where to find it. But it's always better to escape to less light-polluted places.
Nobody knows how long Holmes will stay this bright, or even why. It may have broken apart, or simply thrown off a bunch of gas and dust as it got nearer to the sun and its warmth. We're sure to see more pictures and hear more speculation as we wait for our skies to clear.

Comments
Frank,
I think this comet is moving away from the sun currently. Thus it should not be outgasing any of its surface at this time. This is what has made this so odd of an occurance.
Thanks, Rodney
Posted by: Rodney | October 25, 2007 11:09 PM
Could be a collision, or a critical point in pressure dynamics (it's been cooking inside for a while...;)
Check out my personal amateur astronomy pics at http://realworldnumbers.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/hunting-for-comet-holmes-at-home/
I took these snapshots with my point and shoot camera through my telescope, and they turned out amazing.
I'm in Toronto, but the skyline is pretty similar.
Posted by: Patrick | October 26, 2007 2:27 PM
Frank,
Now that you've written an article about the comet's visibility, can we expect it to disappear? :-)
Posted by: Hal Laurent | October 31, 2007 10:15 AM
I am in the Phoenix area and saw the comet on 11/2 at 9:30 pm MST. Not being very good at finding stars I finally saw it much higher in the sky then I first expected. Once I had seen it with binoculars, I was then able to see it by naked eye. It was basically a very diffused fuzzball.
Posted by: John | November 3, 2007 12:48 AM
I have been taking some timelapse movies of the expanding comet over the past few days. i will be adding more tonight, i got my hands on a great lens.. should get some amazing images.
t
FDR: Here is the link to these comet movies.
http://one.revver.com/playlist/show/291594/
Posted by: thomas | November 5, 2007 3:34 PM